| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/01/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/03/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BUENO, A. de F.; PANIZZI, A. R.; HUNT, T. E.; DOURADO, P. M.; PITTA, R. M.; GONÇALVES, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; ANTONIO RICARDO PANIZZI, CNPT; UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASCA-LINCOLN, LINCOLN; BAYER CROP SCIENCE, SÃO PAULO; RAFAEL MAJOR PITTA, CPAMT; UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA, CURITIBA. |
|
Título: |
Challenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM): the Soybean Example. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Neotropical Entomology, v. 50, p. 5-20, 2021. |
|
Páginas: |
16 p. |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s13744-020-00792-9 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soybean is considered one of today?s most important crops. Planted on millions of hectares worldwide, the management of soybean pests usually requires large amounts of chemicals. However, a key component to meet the increasing demand for food due to the rapidly growing global population is protecting crops from pests while maintaining environmental quality through ecologically and economically sound integrated pest management (IPM) practices. Not only can IPM result in more profitable agriculture due to the reduction of pest control costs but also assures equitable, secure, sufficient, and stable flows of both food and ecosystem services. Despite those ecological and economic benefits, the vast areas of cultivated soybean as well as the convenience of spraying insecticides are encouraging the adoption of prophylactic pest control as a relatively inexpensive safeguard compared to IPM practices. Thus, in this forum, we discuss the reasons for soybean IPM not reaching its potential. We give examples of how we can revive this once successful pest management program with a focus on experiences in Brazil and the USA. We analyze IPM case studies to illustrate the need for growers to have easy and fast access to IPM information on its medium- and long-term benefits. Overall, this forum highlights the importance of IPM for agricultural sustainability including ecological and financial benefits. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Sustentável; Inseticida; Segurança Alimentar; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Crop management; Economic threshold; Food security; Insecticides; Soybeans; Sustainable agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232646/1/ID-40068.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02320naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2129115
005 2022-03-17
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13744-020-00792-9$2DOI
100 1 $aBUENO, A. de F.
245 $aChallenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM)$bthe Soybean Example.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a16 p.
520 $aSoybean is considered one of today?s most important crops. Planted on millions of hectares worldwide, the management of soybean pests usually requires large amounts of chemicals. However, a key component to meet the increasing demand for food due to the rapidly growing global population is protecting crops from pests while maintaining environmental quality through ecologically and economically sound integrated pest management (IPM) practices. Not only can IPM result in more profitable agriculture due to the reduction of pest control costs but also assures equitable, secure, sufficient, and stable flows of both food and ecosystem services. Despite those ecological and economic benefits, the vast areas of cultivated soybean as well as the convenience of spraying insecticides are encouraging the adoption of prophylactic pest control as a relatively inexpensive safeguard compared to IPM practices. Thus, in this forum, we discuss the reasons for soybean IPM not reaching its potential. We give examples of how we can revive this once successful pest management program with a focus on experiences in Brazil and the USA. We analyze IPM case studies to illustrate the need for growers to have easy and fast access to IPM information on its medium- and long-term benefits. Overall, this forum highlights the importance of IPM for agricultural sustainability including ecological and financial benefits.
650 $aCrop management
650 $aEconomic threshold
650 $aFood security
650 $aInsecticides
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aAgricultura Sustentável
650 $aInseticida
650 $aSegurança Alimentar
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aPANIZZI, A. R.
700 1 $aHUNT, T. E.
700 1 $aDOURADO, P. M.
700 1 $aPITTA, R. M.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, J.
773 $tNeotropical Entomology$gv. 50, p. 5-20, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cenargen.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
MOURA, S. M. de; BABILONIA, K.; MACEDO, L. L. P. de; SA, M. F. G. de; SHAN, L.; HE, P.; ALVES-FERREIRA, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
STÉFANIE MENEZES DE MOURA, UFRJ; KEVIN BABILONIA, Texas A&M University, USA; LEONARDO LIMA PEPINO DE MACEDO, Cenargen; MARIA FATIMA GROSSI DE SA, Cenargen; LIBO SHAN, Texas A&M University, USA; PING HE, Texas A&M University, USA; MARCIO ALVES-FERREIRA, UFRJ. |
|
Título: |
The oral secretion from Cotton Boll Weevil (Anthonomus grandis) induces defense responses in cotton (Gossypium spp) and Arabidopsis thaliana. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Current Plant Biology, v. 31, 2022. 100250. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2022.100250 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Na publicação: Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sá. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cotton Boll Weevil; Effector-triggered immunity; MAPK; Pattern-triggered immunity; Receptor-like kinases. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Elicitors. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00928naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2144009
005 2023-09-28
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2022.100250$2DOI
100 1 $aMOURA, S. M. de
245 $aThe oral secretion from Cotton Boll Weevil (Anthonomus grandis) induces defense responses in cotton (Gossypium spp) and Arabidopsis thaliana.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aNa publicação: Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sá.
650 $aElicitors
653 $aCotton Boll Weevil
653 $aEffector-triggered immunity
653 $aMAPK
653 $aPattern-triggered immunity
653 $aReceptor-like kinases
700 1 $aBABILONIA, K.
700 1 $aMACEDO, L. L. P. de
700 1 $aSA, M. F. G. de
700 1 $aSHAN, L.
700 1 $aHE, P.
700 1 $aALVES-FERREIRA, M.
773 $tCurrent Plant Biology$gv. 31, 2022. 100250.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
